Per Aspera Ad Astra

May 01, 2024

Recent EntriesHomeJoin Fast Running Blog Community!PredictorHealthy RecipesCollinAnderson's RacesFind BlogsMileage BoardTop Ten Excuses for Missing a RunTop Ten Training MistakesDiscussion ForumRace Reports Send A Private MessageWeek ViewMonth ViewYear View
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
20122013201420152016201720182019
15% off for Fast Running Blog members at St. George Running Center!

Location:

Salt Lake City,UT,United States

Member Since:

Dec 08, 2012

Gender:

Male

Goal Type:

Local Elite

Running Accomplishments:

13.1: 1:09:58 (2018 Des News)

26.2: 2:37:45 (2019 Mesa Phoenix)

Short-Term Running Goals:

Stay healthy!

 

2019 Running Schedule

Feb - Mesa Phoenix Marathon (AZ): 2:37:45. Lingering flu didn't help, but I still got a PR.

April - Bonneville Shoreline Trail Marathon (UT). Mostly just going to be a training run. Finally got myself into the sub-4 club last year, so I'll just have fun with it this year.

May - Stillwater Half Marathon (MN). Goal race for Spring. Looking for ~1:12.

October- Chicago Marathon (IL). We'll see where I'm at in Fall, but probably will be looking for low 2:30s.

Long-Term Running Goals:

Stay healthy, make improvements, maximize my potential.

Personal:

I am a bioengineering PhD currently working as a post-doctoral research fellow in the Department of Neurology at the University of Utah, where I design and improve neurosurgical approaches for treating movement disorders.


Summer 2018 update: I'm lazy about copying over from Strava, so find me over there for day-to-day runs until I eventually get around to copying everything over here.

Favorite Blogs:

Click to donate
to Ukraine's Armed Forces
Miles:This week: 0.00 Month: 0.00 Year: 0.00
Skechers GoRun 4 Blue - A Bit Too Big, But Free Lifetime Miles: 105.80
Saucony Grid Type A Lifetime Miles: 94.20
Saucony Fastwitch 7 Blue Lifetime Miles: 132.40
Saucony Fastwitch 7 Red Lifetime Miles: 135.90
New Balance Vazee Summit V2 Black Lifetime Miles: 121.90
Skechers Go Med Speed 4 Lifetime Miles: 36.70
Easy MilesMarathon Pace MilesThreshold MilesVO2 Max MilesTotal Distance
6.002.000.000.008.00

Pre-run, found this interesting:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/sns-rt-us-padded-shoes-20131011,0,4536920.story

Sorry Hoka.

 

6.2 miles with James on his "Sugarhouse 10k" loop.  A couple of the miles were probably getting to within the ballpark of marathon effort.  Afterwards, another 1.8 with Holly, because I don't like to end on incomplete mileage and because Holly likes to run.

Night Sleep Time: 0.00Nap Time: 0.00Total Sleep Time: 0.00Weight: 0.00
Comments
From Jake K on Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 13:18:33 from 67.177.11.154

I don't think this is even relevant to Hoka. The study compared two identical shoes, except for the heel insert, which was 15% softer in one version (that isn't very much - I don't have the numbers, but its probably not even close to the difference b/w a Hoka-type shoe and a standard trainer).

So there was essentially zero difference between the shoes for anyone not directly heel striking. And the chances of seeing an overall statistical difference between the groups, no matter how much you try to control as much as possible, are very slim to begin with.

I would say their conclusion should be: "Some people get hurt in cushioned shoes, some people get hurt in less cushioned shoes. A lot people get hurt no matter what. Some don't no matter what they wear. Hurray, we got a publication that told us what we already knew."

From CollinAnderson on Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 13:24:24 from 128.110.93.206

Oh, hah, looked up the study and it is just the heel that is stiffer or softer. Definitely a bit of a misrepresentation there. But still, softer heels (and virtually everyone heel strikes) did nothing to reduce injury. Moral of the story is to not be overweight.

From Jake K on Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 13:28:25 from 67.177.11.154

Yeah, I know how they do these studies. Its a small heel insert that they swap out. You can't tell the difference unless you know what you're looking/feeling for.

Of course being overweight or training errors is going to have more to do with injuries than anything else. But no one wants to hear that. I hate these studies because the average person isn't going to take the time to actually look up even the abstract, and just buy whatever anti-shoe agenda the particular columnist is pushing.

Cushioned shoes aren't bad. Less-cushioned shoes aren't bad either. But that's not an article tagline worth publishing.

From CollinAnderson on Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 13:30:55 from 128.110.93.206

My intuition has always been that cushioning doesn't really matter. If you have less cushioning, you adapt. If you have more, you adapt. The big problem would be suddenly changing between drastically different shoes. Shoes don't really matter all that much, and I just find it silly for overweight runners to shell out hundreds of dollars for gimmicky shoes when the best way to avoid injury is just to lose weight.

Add Your Comment.
  • Keep it family-safe. No vulgar or profane language. To discourage anonymous comments of cowardly nature, your IP address will be logged and posted next to your comment.
  • Do not respond to another person's comment out of context. If he made the original comment on another page/blog entry, go to that entry and respond there.
  • If all you want to do is contact the blogger and your comment is not connected with this entry and has no relevance to others, send a private message instead.
Only registered users with public blogs are allowed to post comments. Log in with your username and password or create an account and set up a blog.
Debt Reduction Calculator
Featured Announcements
Lone Faithfuls
(need a comment):
Recent Comments: